Presenting Engagement: Sunday rules.
As a kid, I would spend about a month at my grandparents’ home every summer and every Sunday afternoon we’d go over to the next county to visit other folks in the family. They lived in a village of less than a thousand people nestled in the shadow of a low mountain range bordering a long Tennessee Valley Authority lake.
Still in church clothes, the grown ups would sit in green, straight back rockers on the front porch and talk about local gossip and wayward family members. I, still in church clothes, would sit on the front porch floor, pretty bored, playing with a toy car or I could shuffle down the privet-lined, gravel lane that ran from the house to the intersection with the main road down next to the court house. There were no buildings between the house and the corner so you could see the back of the court house as plain as day. And there in back of that building was a large sort of yard where men lounged all afternoon on summer Sundays.
Once I asked who those men were who always lounged there and I learned a major distinction about the front and back of any rural court house. The men who loitered in front of the court house, slicing chunks of tobacco from plugs of Reynolds Natural Leaf were citizens in good standing while the men who loitered in the fenced-in yard behind the building, slicing similar chunks from identical plugs of Reynolds Natural Leaf, were convicts. It seemed by definition, the rule was that good folks got to have their tobacco in front of the hall of justice but the desperados had to go around back.
Rules. Rules. Rules.
You can’t get away from the rules, no matter where you are or how you live or what day of the week it is and Sunday was a day when the rules were applied more enthusiastically than all the other days of the week.
In Fact, this indolent, summer time ritual of visiting the kin on Sunday afternoon was chocked full of rules. There were rules about what you could wear, where you could go, how grimy you could get, how noisy and boisterous you could be around adults. Of course life wasn’t any less strict for those adults because they weren’t allowed to do their work on Sunday and none of the adults I knew played golf because the local Baptists thought it was somehow related to dancing.
But not working on Sunday simply for the reason that it was Sunday made very little sense to me as a child. In other words, the “causistry” of Sunday sabbath regulations did not appear rational to my kid-sized brain.
So I eventually asked my grandfather about why the preacher worked on Sunday. Well, it seemed the preacher had a special sanction. I asked who was down at the T V A on Sunday making sure that the big dam didn’t burst and flood the town. It seemed that people called engineers had a special sanction too. Doctors had special sanction if there was an emergency and of course farmers had really special sanctions or else the splotched Guernsey dairy cattle would bloat all up and the pigs and chickens would die of thirst or starvation. The people with the biggest sanction of all on Sundays were moms and wives because without them, well without them all the men and boys would have starved including the farmers, doctors, engineers, preachers, and even court house jail guards. Not a pretty picture.
So, it seems only natural that if all these kinds of mere mortals get sanctions to work on Sabbath then Jesus of Nazareth ought to get a sanction too! But the synagogue leaders did not see things with the clarity of a child.
Their causistry was obscure, but rules were rules.
Biblical Context: Jesus’ controversy.
Now, when it came to the matter of how religious practices were mediated in Hebrew society Jesus was precocious as a child and confrontational as an adult. You recall how he was already unsettling the religious establishment as a twelve year old asking those embarassingly insightful questions to the Jerusalem temple elders. As minister who is the parent of a teenager, I know how that goes. It can be frustrating to say the least!
And as he became older, Jesus continued to speak truth. In fact, you could say he was a religious activist who had so many confrontations with religious leaders over the three years of his preaching and healing ministry that his activism ultimately was the presenting argument for putting him on the cross to die.
Part of that activism was that he never seemed to go along with the established causistry of religious regulations. In fact, he thought the religious establishment had gotten it all wrong and were misleading the people.
It wasn’t that Jesus disrespected human authority; it was that he respected God’s sovereign authority above all.
So there he was in one of the local synagogues one Sabbath day, teaching as a rabbi normally would. A woman entered with a crippling ailment that caused her back to bow right over so that she could not even stand up straight. Anyone with even a touch of osteo arthritis can understand exactly what she was going through.
Jesus saw her plight and unburdened her. Did you notice how Luke presents Jesus’ statement? “Woman, you are set free from your ailment.”[i]
Set free! Liberated! This claim is a direct, metaphorical reference to the Egyptian exodus when God set the Israelites free from slavery to the Pharaohs. Now Jesus has set this woman free from bondage to her crippling ailment.
But the synagogue leader did not think it was right to do miracles on the Sabbath because this leader, standing there in the same room with Jesus, spoke disparagingly about Jesus’ act of healing.
The description in the gospel makes the synagogue leader sound like a politician who is disgruntled over another politician’s stance in a debate. If you watch those debates, have you noticed how the candidates put eachother down without making honest eye contact with each other? They look at the debate moderator and the television camera but avoid looking at the person they are attempting to belittle with their answer. The strategy is to get the crowd on their side and make their opponent seem totally unworthy of recognition.
That is just what this particular synagogue leader wanted. He was outraged that Jesus the rabbi had come into the synagogue and healed someone on the Sabbath so instead of glaring at that rabbi, the leader addressed the crowd who were assembled there and quoted the Ten Commandments. “Don’t come in here on the Sabbath and expect to be healed and don’t follow anyone who does work on the Sabbath,” he’s saying.
But Jesus of Nazareth did not play to the crowd. He responded directly to the synagogue leader, looking him directly in the eye and saying: “You hypocrites!”[ii] Perhaps noting that special sanction for farmers, Jesus pointed out how even the oxen and donkeys get watered on the Sabbath. Wasn’t that work? Didn’t the synagogue leader do this work on the Sabbath too? And here was this Hebrew woman, a spiritual descendent of Abraham, a family member of God’s chosen people. Was her liberation less valuable than the watering of a donkey or an ox?
Explication of Text: What’s it all mean?
The resources of Hollywood could probably turn this exchange between Jesus and the synagogue leader into a cinematic blockbuster. It has all you could ask for: pathos, moral outrage, a hero who sticks up for the little person against the hard-hearted establishment. All that stuff that makes a great movie moment is right here in this gospel account by Luke.
There are actually two things going on in this story. First, this is a didactic moment, a teaching moment.
What Jesus was teaching that day was that scrupulous adherence to the letter of the Torah law[iii] pointed out a moral fallacy. It pointed out how these hypocritical people were so stuck in the rut of scriptural absolutism that they missed the fact that healing this woman was more righteous than ignoring her on account of the Sabbath.
Healing is divine work. Jesus was teaching the crowd and the leaders that doing God’s work takes place every single day of the week. Rest from your profit making labors on the Sabbath but don’t ever rest from your divine chores.
It is particularly significant that this woman’s crippling illness was thought to be the work of Satan. In the scriptures, we find that any debilitation was considered caused by evil spirits and so if you were leperous or crippled or bleeding from sores that would not close, you were ostracized from healthy society. No one would eat with you or touch you or befriend you in any way.
The healing of this woman was more than physical healing. Jesus was liberating her from a severe illness and at the same time he was reconciling her with her people, her kin, the other descendents of Abraham in that place. God’s will is the reconciliation and restoration of people each and every day of the week.
First, this is a didactic moment. Second, Jesus was a prophet and this is a prophetic moment.
The prophecy here is that the Kingdom of God is constantly breaking into this everyday world that we live in. This world thinks in terms of the concrete rather than the abstract. This world wants quantifiable performance results and test scores and metric analysis and church growth figures.
But the kingdom of God does not operate on these human terms. You can’t measure reconciliation. You can’t pick up a handful of restoration and put it in a test tube, fire up a bunson burner under it and find out at what temperature it boils.
Jesus’ prophecy tells me that the Kingdom of God is not found in the absolutism of doctrine. It is found in loving my neighbor as myself. It is found in the divine chores of liberation and healing. If I bury my head in the absolutism of the Sabbath regulations and don’t do my divine chores, then the Kingdom of God might pass right by me and I will have missed it.
Listener Context: How does this relate to my life?
I think it is often very difficult to parse God’s will in the Bible because much of scripture relates to the particular rather than the general. We look for universal truth in stories of particular situations in particular lives thousands of years ago. So it may be disconcerting and confusing when we come across a text like this one today because this particular story of this particular situation seems to contradict the particular divine commandment to observe the Sabbath that comes from another particular story a thousand years earlier.
The German scholar, Gunther Bornkamm wrote that Jesus’ offense in the synagogue that day was not an offense against the Sabbath itself. Jesus’ offence was against “Sabbath causistry” developed to excrutiating exactitude by a pedantic religious hierarchy.[iv] In other words, the commandment to observe the Sabbath wasn’t what Jesus objected to. He objected to the social custom that had been developed around the commandment. He objected to the fact that that social custom had obscured the original relevance of the Sabbath.
It is oh so easy to venture forth into a noble cause only to find that after time has passed we have forgotten our original intent, lost the original relevance of our endeavor. And when that happens, all we have left is a hollow ritual.
I think we can find this in any number of places in our lives. Perhaps we have turned lively and meaningful celebrations into routine procedures. We might have turned precious relationships into wooden associations. We might have turned interesting work into weekday routines just for the sake of a paycheck.
When that happens, it is unfortunate.
But when those rare moments happen in which the presence of the Kingdom of God flashes by and we miss it because we were too busy performing fossilized traditions out of some short sighted sense of formality, well that is more than unfortunate. It is isolating and hope denying.
Conclusion: What’s the Point?
Jesus Christ is our best hope in life and in death. Don’t miss his presence and lose that hope. Be watchful for signs that the Kingdom of God is present. You’ll know it when you see it.
You’ll know it when someone goes out of their way to do a senseless act of kindness for someone else.
You’ll know it when someone forgives someone else even though they are not obligated to.
You’ll know it when old enemies make peace.
You’ll know it when someone gives their time to tutor a child or visit a shut in or welcomes a stranger into the church or begins a recycling program or speaks some unpopular truth.
You might just see it while you’re sitting on the front porch in a green straight backed rocker conversing with your family on a Sunday afternoon in the summer in your church clothes.
For heaven’s sake, don’t miss it! Amen.
As a kid, I would spend about a month at my grandparents’ home every summer and every Sunday afternoon we’d go over to the next county to visit other folks in the family. They lived in a village of less than a thousand people nestled in the shadow of a low mountain range bordering a long Tennessee Valley Authority lake.
Still in church clothes, the grown ups would sit in green, straight back rockers on the front porch and talk about local gossip and wayward family members. I, still in church clothes, would sit on the front porch floor, pretty bored, playing with a toy car or I could shuffle down the privet-lined, gravel lane that ran from the house to the intersection with the main road down next to the court house. There were no buildings between the house and the corner so you could see the back of the court house as plain as day. And there in back of that building was a large sort of yard where men lounged all afternoon on summer Sundays.
Once I asked who those men were who always lounged there and I learned a major distinction about the front and back of any rural court house. The men who loitered in front of the court house, slicing chunks of tobacco from plugs of Reynolds Natural Leaf were citizens in good standing while the men who loitered in the fenced-in yard behind the building, slicing similar chunks from identical plugs of Reynolds Natural Leaf, were convicts. It seemed by definition, the rule was that good folks got to have their tobacco in front of the hall of justice but the desperados had to go around back.
Rules. Rules. Rules.
You can’t get away from the rules, no matter where you are or how you live or what day of the week it is and Sunday was a day when the rules were applied more enthusiastically than all the other days of the week.
In Fact, this indolent, summer time ritual of visiting the kin on Sunday afternoon was chocked full of rules. There were rules about what you could wear, where you could go, how grimy you could get, how noisy and boisterous you could be around adults. Of course life wasn’t any less strict for those adults because they weren’t allowed to do their work on Sunday and none of the adults I knew played golf because the local Baptists thought it was somehow related to dancing.
But not working on Sunday simply for the reason that it was Sunday made very little sense to me as a child. In other words, the “causistry” of Sunday sabbath regulations did not appear rational to my kid-sized brain.
So I eventually asked my grandfather about why the preacher worked on Sunday. Well, it seemed the preacher had a special sanction. I asked who was down at the T V A on Sunday making sure that the big dam didn’t burst and flood the town. It seemed that people called engineers had a special sanction too. Doctors had special sanction if there was an emergency and of course farmers had really special sanctions or else the splotched Guernsey dairy cattle would bloat all up and the pigs and chickens would die of thirst or starvation. The people with the biggest sanction of all on Sundays were moms and wives because without them, well without them all the men and boys would have starved including the farmers, doctors, engineers, preachers, and even court house jail guards. Not a pretty picture.
So, it seems only natural that if all these kinds of mere mortals get sanctions to work on Sabbath then Jesus of Nazareth ought to get a sanction too! But the synagogue leaders did not see things with the clarity of a child.
Their causistry was obscure, but rules were rules.
Biblical Context: Jesus’ controversy.
Now, when it came to the matter of how religious practices were mediated in Hebrew society Jesus was precocious as a child and confrontational as an adult. You recall how he was already unsettling the religious establishment as a twelve year old asking those embarassingly insightful questions to the Jerusalem temple elders. As minister who is the parent of a teenager, I know how that goes. It can be frustrating to say the least!
And as he became older, Jesus continued to speak truth. In fact, you could say he was a religious activist who had so many confrontations with religious leaders over the three years of his preaching and healing ministry that his activism ultimately was the presenting argument for putting him on the cross to die.
Part of that activism was that he never seemed to go along with the established causistry of religious regulations. In fact, he thought the religious establishment had gotten it all wrong and were misleading the people.
It wasn’t that Jesus disrespected human authority; it was that he respected God’s sovereign authority above all.
So there he was in one of the local synagogues one Sabbath day, teaching as a rabbi normally would. A woman entered with a crippling ailment that caused her back to bow right over so that she could not even stand up straight. Anyone with even a touch of osteo arthritis can understand exactly what she was going through.
Jesus saw her plight and unburdened her. Did you notice how Luke presents Jesus’ statement? “Woman, you are set free from your ailment.”[i]
Set free! Liberated! This claim is a direct, metaphorical reference to the Egyptian exodus when God set the Israelites free from slavery to the Pharaohs. Now Jesus has set this woman free from bondage to her crippling ailment.
But the synagogue leader did not think it was right to do miracles on the Sabbath because this leader, standing there in the same room with Jesus, spoke disparagingly about Jesus’ act of healing.
The description in the gospel makes the synagogue leader sound like a politician who is disgruntled over another politician’s stance in a debate. If you watch those debates, have you noticed how the candidates put eachother down without making honest eye contact with each other? They look at the debate moderator and the television camera but avoid looking at the person they are attempting to belittle with their answer. The strategy is to get the crowd on their side and make their opponent seem totally unworthy of recognition.
That is just what this particular synagogue leader wanted. He was outraged that Jesus the rabbi had come into the synagogue and healed someone on the Sabbath so instead of glaring at that rabbi, the leader addressed the crowd who were assembled there and quoted the Ten Commandments. “Don’t come in here on the Sabbath and expect to be healed and don’t follow anyone who does work on the Sabbath,” he’s saying.
But Jesus of Nazareth did not play to the crowd. He responded directly to the synagogue leader, looking him directly in the eye and saying: “You hypocrites!”[ii] Perhaps noting that special sanction for farmers, Jesus pointed out how even the oxen and donkeys get watered on the Sabbath. Wasn’t that work? Didn’t the synagogue leader do this work on the Sabbath too? And here was this Hebrew woman, a spiritual descendent of Abraham, a family member of God’s chosen people. Was her liberation less valuable than the watering of a donkey or an ox?
Explication of Text: What’s it all mean?
The resources of Hollywood could probably turn this exchange between Jesus and the synagogue leader into a cinematic blockbuster. It has all you could ask for: pathos, moral outrage, a hero who sticks up for the little person against the hard-hearted establishment. All that stuff that makes a great movie moment is right here in this gospel account by Luke.
There are actually two things going on in this story. First, this is a didactic moment, a teaching moment.
What Jesus was teaching that day was that scrupulous adherence to the letter of the Torah law[iii] pointed out a moral fallacy. It pointed out how these hypocritical people were so stuck in the rut of scriptural absolutism that they missed the fact that healing this woman was more righteous than ignoring her on account of the Sabbath.
Healing is divine work. Jesus was teaching the crowd and the leaders that doing God’s work takes place every single day of the week. Rest from your profit making labors on the Sabbath but don’t ever rest from your divine chores.
It is particularly significant that this woman’s crippling illness was thought to be the work of Satan. In the scriptures, we find that any debilitation was considered caused by evil spirits and so if you were leperous or crippled or bleeding from sores that would not close, you were ostracized from healthy society. No one would eat with you or touch you or befriend you in any way.
The healing of this woman was more than physical healing. Jesus was liberating her from a severe illness and at the same time he was reconciling her with her people, her kin, the other descendents of Abraham in that place. God’s will is the reconciliation and restoration of people each and every day of the week.
First, this is a didactic moment. Second, Jesus was a prophet and this is a prophetic moment.
The prophecy here is that the Kingdom of God is constantly breaking into this everyday world that we live in. This world thinks in terms of the concrete rather than the abstract. This world wants quantifiable performance results and test scores and metric analysis and church growth figures.
But the kingdom of God does not operate on these human terms. You can’t measure reconciliation. You can’t pick up a handful of restoration and put it in a test tube, fire up a bunson burner under it and find out at what temperature it boils.
Jesus’ prophecy tells me that the Kingdom of God is not found in the absolutism of doctrine. It is found in loving my neighbor as myself. It is found in the divine chores of liberation and healing. If I bury my head in the absolutism of the Sabbath regulations and don’t do my divine chores, then the Kingdom of God might pass right by me and I will have missed it.
Listener Context: How does this relate to my life?
I think it is often very difficult to parse God’s will in the Bible because much of scripture relates to the particular rather than the general. We look for universal truth in stories of particular situations in particular lives thousands of years ago. So it may be disconcerting and confusing when we come across a text like this one today because this particular story of this particular situation seems to contradict the particular divine commandment to observe the Sabbath that comes from another particular story a thousand years earlier.
The German scholar, Gunther Bornkamm wrote that Jesus’ offense in the synagogue that day was not an offense against the Sabbath itself. Jesus’ offence was against “Sabbath causistry” developed to excrutiating exactitude by a pedantic religious hierarchy.[iv] In other words, the commandment to observe the Sabbath wasn’t what Jesus objected to. He objected to the social custom that had been developed around the commandment. He objected to the fact that that social custom had obscured the original relevance of the Sabbath.
It is oh so easy to venture forth into a noble cause only to find that after time has passed we have forgotten our original intent, lost the original relevance of our endeavor. And when that happens, all we have left is a hollow ritual.
I think we can find this in any number of places in our lives. Perhaps we have turned lively and meaningful celebrations into routine procedures. We might have turned precious relationships into wooden associations. We might have turned interesting work into weekday routines just for the sake of a paycheck.
When that happens, it is unfortunate.
But when those rare moments happen in which the presence of the Kingdom of God flashes by and we miss it because we were too busy performing fossilized traditions out of some short sighted sense of formality, well that is more than unfortunate. It is isolating and hope denying.
Conclusion: What’s the Point?
Jesus Christ is our best hope in life and in death. Don’t miss his presence and lose that hope. Be watchful for signs that the Kingdom of God is present. You’ll know it when you see it.
You’ll know it when someone goes out of their way to do a senseless act of kindness for someone else.
You’ll know it when someone forgives someone else even though they are not obligated to.
You’ll know it when old enemies make peace.
You’ll know it when someone gives their time to tutor a child or visit a shut in or welcomes a stranger into the church or begins a recycling program or speaks some unpopular truth.
You might just see it while you’re sitting on the front porch in a green straight backed rocker conversing with your family on a Sunday afternoon in the summer in your church clothes.
For heaven’s sake, don’t miss it! Amen.
1 comment:
Oi, achei seu blog pelo google está bem interessante gostei desse post. Gostaria de falar sobre o CresceNet. O CresceNet é um provedor de internet discada que remunera seus usuários pelo tempo conectado. Exatamente isso que você leu, estão pagando para você conectar. O provedor paga 20 centavos por hora de conexão discada com ligação local para mais de 2100 cidades do Brasil. O CresceNet tem um acelerador de conexão, que deixa sua conexão até 10 vezes mais rápida. Quem utiliza banda larga pode lucrar também, basta se cadastrar no CresceNet e quando for dormir conectar por discada, é possível pagar a ADSL só com o dinheiro da discada. Nos horários de minuto único o gasto com telefone é mínimo e a remuneração do CresceNet generosa. Se você quiser linkar o CresceNet(www.provedorcrescenet.com) no seu blog eu ficaria agradecido, até mais e sucesso. (If he will be possible add the CresceNet(www.provedorcrescenet.com) in your blogroll I thankful, bye friend).
Post a Comment